Kileleshwa MCA Robert Alai has publicly criticised senior leadership within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), accusing top officials of being inaccessible and disconnected from grassroots members.
His remarks have intensified ongoing debates about the party’s internal cohesion and future direction, particularly in the absence of long-time leader Raila Odinga.
Speaking during a recent media appearance, Alai singled out ODM Chairperson and Homa Bay Governor Gladys Wanga, alongside Oburu Odinga, alleging that they have failed to maintain communication with party members.
According to him, calls from grassroots leaders and elected officials often go unanswered, creating a sense of exclusion and frustration within the party ranks.
Robert Alai: Today, if Oburu Odinga comes to Nairobi and wants to meet the ODM MCAs, who does he speak to?
The majority whip doesn’t listen to him, the majority leader doesn’t listen to him, and the Speaker doesn’t talk to him
We just did not prepare for Baba’s absence… pic.twitter.com/UyICaQ4mBn
— Radio Generation (@RadioGenKe) March 30, 2026
Alai argued that this lack of accessibility reflects deeper leadership challenges within ODM, rather than isolated misunderstandings or individual conflicts. In his view, the issue goes beyond personalities and points to structural weaknesses that could undermine the party’s stability if not urgently addressed.
One of his most pointed concerns was the apparent disconnect between senior leadership and elected representatives at the county level. He questioned how party coordination is expected to function when communication channels are ineffective. “If Oburu Odinga comes to Nairobi and wants to meet ODM MCAs, who does he speak to?” Alai posed, highlighting what he sees as a breakdown in internal organization.
He further claimed that key figures within Nairobi’s county assembly leadership—including the majority whip, majority leader, and Speaker—are not aligned or responsive, making it difficult for even senior party leaders to engage effectively with local structures. This, he suggested, creates confusion and weakens the party’s ability to operate cohesively.
Beyond communication issues, Alai raised concerns about ODM’s preparedness for a future without Raila Odinga, popularly known as “Baba.” He warned that the party has not adequately planned for leadership transition, leaving it vulnerable at a critical moment in Kenya’s political landscape.
According to Alai, ODM risks stagnation if it continues to revolve around a single figure without building strong, independent institutions. He emphasized the need for deliberate efforts to nurture new leadership and ensure that the party remains relevant beyond its founding generation.
A particularly sensitive aspect of his remarks was his rejection of any notion that ODM should be treated as a family entity. Without directly naming individuals in this context, he cautioned against the perception that leadership positions are reserved for a specific lineage, arguing that such an approach could alienate loyal members and weaken internal democracy.
Alai also highlighted the frustrations of younger party members and frontline officials, who he says feel increasingly sidelined in decision-making processes. He stressed that ignoring these voices could have serious consequences, especially as the party seeks to maintain its influence ahead of future elections.
His comments come at a time when ODM is experiencing visible internal tensions, with differing views emerging on leadership, strategy, and alliances. The rise of factions within the party has further fueled speculation about its long-term unity and direction.
Political analysts note that Alai’s statements reflect a broader conversation happening within many political parties in Kenya—how to transition from personality-driven movements to institution-based organisations. For ODM, this challenge is particularly significant given Raila Odinga’s central role in shaping its identity over the years.
At the same time, some observers caution that public criticism of party leadership, while highlighting genuine concerns, could also deepen divisions if not handled constructively. They argue that internal dialogue and structured reforms may be more effective in addressing the issues raised.
Nevertheless, Alai’s remarks have resonated with a section of party supporters who share similar frustrations about communication gaps and leadership responsiveness. His call for reform is likely to add pressure on ODM’s top leadership to engage more actively with members and clarify the party’s future roadmap.
As Kenya’s political environment continues to evolve, the ability of parties like ODM to adapt will be crucial. For Alai, the message is clear: without stronger communication, inclusive leadership, and a clear succession plan, the party risks losing its cohesion and relevance in the years ahead.
The unfolding debate now places ODM at a crossroads—between maintaining its legacy and embracing reforms that could define its next chapter.
